Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database 100 Feedback    Home


Related trials

SPIRIT IV, 2010 - everolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

BASKET-PROVE (SES), 2010 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

GISSOC II, 2010 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

SORT-OUT-3, 2010 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent

RESOLUTE, 2010 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs everolimus eluting stent

BASKET-PROVE (EES), 2010 - everolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase

DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent

ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent

ZEST (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis

ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer vs sirolimus eluting stent

COMPARE, 2009 - everolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

ENDEAVOR IV, 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

GENIUS-STEMI, 2009 - Genous stent vs bare-metal stent

ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent

ISAR-TEST-4 (biodegradable polymer), 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer vs sirolimus eluting stent

ZEST (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent

PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent

ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009 - polymer free sirolimus stent vs sirolimus eluting stent

ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol eluting stent vs zotarolimus eluting stent

Thiele, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent



See also:

  • All coronary artery disease clinical trials
  • All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of PCI
  • All clinical trials of paclitaxel eluting stent
  •  

    HORIZONS-AMI Stent study, 2008

    Facebook    pdf : paclitaxel eluting stent - myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction

    Treatments

    Studied treatment paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus)
    Control treatment BMS (Express)
    Concomittant treatment aspirin indefinitely, and thienopyridine use was mandated up to 6 months, and strongly encouraged thereafter
    Remarks Patients received either unfractionated heparin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide or abciximab) or bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in a 2 x 2 factorial design

    Patients

    Patients ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Inclusion criteria STEMI >20 minutes and <12 hours in duration (ST-segment elevation of >=1 mm in >=2 contiguous leads; or presumably new left bundle branch block or true posterior MI with ST depression of >=1 mm in >=2 contiguous anterior leads); Patients with cardiogenic shock, left main disease, etc., were not excluded Age >=18 years The presence of at least one acute infarct artery target vessel in which all significant lesions are eligible for stenting with study stents, and all such lesions have a visually estimated reference diameter >=2.25 mm and <=4.0 mm Expected ability to deliver the stent(s) to all culprit lesions (absence of excessive proximal tortuosity or severe calcification); Expected ability to fully expand the stent(s) at all culprit lesions (absence of marked calcification)
    Exclusion criteria Contraindication to any of the study medications Prior administration of thrombolytic therapy, bivalirudin, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparin or fondaparinux for the present admission (prior unfractionated heparin allowed) Current use of Coumadin History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions History of intracerebral mass, aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, or hemorrhagic stroke; stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months or any permanent neurologic deficit; gastrointestinal or gastrourinary bleed within 2 months, or major surgery within 6 weeks; recent or known platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or hemoglobin <10 g/dl Planned elective surgical procedure that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post-enrollment Bifurcation lesion definitely requiring implantation of stents in both the main vessel and a side branch Infarct-related artery is an unprotected left main >100 mm of study stent length anticipated Infarction due to stent thrombosis, or infarct lesion at the site of a previously implanted stent High likelihood of coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days anticipated
    Baseline characteristics
    age 59.6 y 
    diabetes (%) 16% 
    lesion length (mm) 30.8 vs 27.3 mm 
    reference-vessel diameter 2.9 mm 
    Lesion diameter inclusion criteria 2.25 - 4 mm 
    Female (%) 23% 

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 2257 / 749 (studied vs. control)
    Design Factorial plan
    Blinding open
    Follow-up duration 1 year
    Hypothesis Non inferiority
    Primary endpoint MACE death, MI, stroke,stent thrombosis


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    MACE

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    1,02 [0,77;1,35]

    All cause death

    79 / 2257
    26 / 749
    1,01 [0,65;1,56]

    MI (fatal and non fatal)

    84 / 2257
    34 / 749
    0,82 [0,56;1,21]

    target-vessel revascularization

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,65 [0,49;0,86]

    target lesion revascularisation

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,59 [0,42;0,83]

    angiographic restenosis

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,44 [0,33;0,58]

    Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)

    70 / 2257
    25 / 749
    0,93 [0,59;1,46]

    2 yr Death (all cause)

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,83 [0,57;1,20]

    2 yr MACE

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,98 [0,77;1,25]

    2 yr TLR

    NA / 2257
    NA / 749
    0,58 [0,44;0,76]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 79 / 2257 (3,5%) 26 / 749 (3,5%) 1,01 [0,65;1,56]  
    MI (fatal and non fatal) 84 / 2257 (3,7%) 34 / 749 (4,5%) 0,82 [0,56;1,21]  
    Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up) 70 / 2257 (3,1%) 25 / 749 (3,3%) 0,93 [0,59;1,46]  
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 0:

  • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 3,50% 3,47% 0,3‰
    MI (fatal and non fatal) 3,72% 4,54% -8,2‰
    Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up) 3,10% 3,34% -2,4‰

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    Drug eluting stent in coronary artery disease for all type of patients

    Drug eluting stent in coronary artery disease for acute myocardial infarction

    myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients

    PCI in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NA

    (c) 2004-2011 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend