Related trials
IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control
AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin
ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)
ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin
SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo
ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)
Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo
ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe
JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet
GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment
Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin
METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo
Chello et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
ASPEN (primary prevention sub group), 2006 - atorvastatin vs placebo
Patti et al., 2006 - preoperative atorvastatin vs placebo
MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin vs control
FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo
See also:
All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention
All clinical trials of pravastatin
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
pravastatine 40 mg daily
|
Control treatment |
placebo
|
Concomittant treatment |
diet |
Treatments description |
total cholesterol change |
20.0% |
LDL change |
-26% |
HDL change |
+5% |
|
Patients
Patients |
men aged 45-64 yr with no history of myocardial infarction and with raised plasma cholesterol levels (LDL cholesterol of at least 155 mg/dL, total cholesterol
of at least 252 mg/dL) |
Inclusion criteria |
fasting LDL cholesterol level of at least 155 mg per deciliter during the second and third visits, with at least one value of 174 mg per deciliter or above (4.5 mmol per liter) and one value of 232 mg per deciliter or below (6.0 mmol per liter); no serious ECG abnormalities according to Minnesota code 1 (pathologic Q waves), 4-1, 5-1, or 7-1-1 or arrhythmia such as atrial fibrillation; and no history of myocardial infarction or other serious illness, although men with stable angina who had not been hospitalized within the previous 12 months were eligible |
Baseline characteristics |
Age (mean), yrs |
55 yr |
Women (%) |
0 |
prior MI or CHD (%) |
5% |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) |
7.1 mmol/L |
LDL (mmol/l) |
4.99 mmol/L |
HDL (mmol/l) |
1.14 mmol/L |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) |
163 |
Diabetes(%) |
1% |
BMI (kg/m2) |
26 |
Stroke history |
NA |
LV hypertrophy |
NA |
History of hypertension (%) |
15% |
|
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
3302 / 3293 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
double blind |
Follow-up duration |
4.9 years |
Number of centre |
multicenter |
Geographic area |
Scotland |
Hypothesis |
Superiority |
Primary endpoint |
coronary events (CHD death, MI) |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Coronary event
174 / 3302
248 / 3293
0,70 [0,58;0,84]
All cause death
106 / 3302
136 / 3293
0,78 [0,61;1,00]
Cardiovascular death
50 / 3302
73 / 3293
0,68 [0,48;0,98]
cardiovascular events
145 / 3302
248 / 3293
0,58 [0,48;0,71]
Fatal stroke
6 / 3302
4 / 3293
classic
1,50 [0,42;5,30]
new-onset diabetes
75 / 2999
93 / 2975
0,80 [0,59;1,08]
Coronary death
38 / 3302
52 / 3293
0,73 [0,48;1,10]
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
46 / 3302
51 / 3293
0,90 [0,61;1,34]
Non fatal MI
143 / 3302
204 / 3293
0,70 [0,57;0,86]
Rhabdomyolysis
0 / 3302
0 / 3293
classic
1,00 [0,00;254,88]
Death from cancer
44 / 3302
49 / 3293
0,90 [0,60;1,34]
Coronary death and non fatal MI
174 / 3302
248 / 3293
0,70 [0,58;0,84]
cardiac death
38 / 3302
52 / 3293
0,73 [0,48;1,10]
non cardiovascular death
68 / 3302
83 / 3293
0,82 [0,60;1,12]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event
|
174 / 3302 (5,3%) |
248 / 3293 (7,5%) |
0,70 |
[0,58;0,84] |
|
|
All cause death
|
106 / 3302 (3,2%) |
136 / 3293 (4,1%) |
0,78 |
[0,61;1,00] |
|
|
Cardiovascular death
|
50 / 3302 (1,5%) |
73 / 3293 (2,2%) |
0,68 |
[0,48;0,98] |
|
|
cardiovascular events
|
145 / 3302 (4,4%) |
248 / 3293 (7,5%) |
0,58 |
[0,48;0,71] |
|
|
Fatal stroke
|
6 / 3302 (0,2%) |
4 / 3293 (0,1%) |
1,50 |
[0,42;5,30] |
|
|
new-onset diabetes
|
75 / 2999 (2,5%) |
93 / 2975 (3,1%) |
0,80 |
[0,59;1,08] |
sub group |
12095 |
Coronary death
|
38 / 3302 (1,2%) |
52 / 3293 (1,6%) |
0,73 |
[0,48;1,10] |
|
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal)
|
46 / 3302 (1,4%) |
51 / 3293 (1,5%) |
0,90 |
[0,61;1,34] |
|
|
Non fatal MI
|
143 / 3302 (4,3%) |
204 / 3293 (6,2%) |
0,70 |
[0,57;0,86] |
|
|
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0 / 3302 (0,0%) |
0 / 3293 (0,0%) |
1,00 |
[0,02;50,25] |
|
18904 |
Death from cancer
|
44 / 3302 (1,3%) |
49 / 3293 (1,5%) |
0,90 |
[0,60;1,34] |
|
|
Coronary death and non fatal MI
|
174 / 3302 (5,3%) |
248 / 3293 (7,5%) |
0,70 |
[0,58;0,84] |
|
|
cardiac death
|
38 / 3302 (1,2%) |
52 / 3293 (1,6%) |
0,73 |
[0,48;1,10] |
|
|
non cardiovascular death
|
68 / 3302 (2,1%) |
83 / 3293 (2,5%) |
0,82 |
[0,60;1,12] |
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
18904: Law M, Rudnicka ARStatin safety: a systematic review.Am J Cardiol 2006;97:52C-60C
12095: Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Stott DJ, Westendorp RG, Shepherd J, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Marchioli R, Marfisi RM, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, TognonStatins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials.Lancet 2010 Feb 27;375:735-742
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4.9 years)
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Coronary event |
5,27% |
7,53% |
-2,26%
|
All cause death |
3,21% |
4,13% |
-0,92%
|
Cardiovascular death |
1,51% |
2,22% |
-0,70%
|
cardiovascular events |
4,39% |
7,53% |
-3,14%
|
Fatal stroke |
1,82‰ |
1,21‰ |
0,06%
|
new-onset diabetes |
2,50% |
3,13% |
-0,63%
|
Coronary death |
1,15% |
1,58% |
-0,43%
|
stroke (fatal and non fatal) |
1,39% |
1,55% |
-0,16%
|
Non fatal MI |
4,33% |
6,19% |
-1,86%
|
Death from cancer |
1,33% |
1,49% |
-0,16%
|
Coronary death and non fatal MI |
5,27% |
7,53% |
-2,26%
|
cardiac death |
1,15% |
1,58% |
-0,43%
|
non cardiovascular death |
2,06% |
2,52% |
-0,46%
|
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for primary prevention
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with LDL elevation and without CHD
cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
Reference(s)
TrialResults-center ID |
TRC2589
|
Trials register # |
NA
|
-
Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ,.
Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group..
N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1301-7
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
-
.
A coronary primary prevention study of Scottish men aged 45-64 years: trial design. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group..
J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:849-60
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|