| 
 
		
		Related trials
		 
				 ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib  vs placebo 
				 IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe  vs control 
				 dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib  vs placebo 
				 dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib  vs placebo 
				 AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe  vs niacin 
				 SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose  vs simvastatin 
				 ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate  vs placebo (on top simvastatine) 
				 ACCORD lipid (subgroup Eye study), 2010 - fenofibrate  vs placebo (on top simvastatine) 
				 DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib  vs placebo 
				 ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin  vs ezetimibe 
				 ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate  vs placebo 
				 Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment  vs standard teatment 
				 Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet  vs mediterranean-style diet 
				 GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib  vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin) 
				 SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose  vs pravastatin 
				 Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib  vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin) 
				 ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib  vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin) 
				 CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
 
 
		See also:
		All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
				
			
			
				
					All diabetes type 2 clinical trials
				
			
		
			
			All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs 
			
		
		
			
			All clinical trials of fenofibrate |  | 
	Treatments
	
		| Studied treatment | fenofibrate on top simvastatin 160 mg per day adjusted according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate
 |  
		| Control treatment | placebo (on top simvastatine) 
 |  
			| Remarks | participants were also randomized to either intensive or standard glycemic control and to either intensive or standard blood-pressure control. Glycemic-control ACCORD study was stopped early, in February 2008, because of higher mortality in the intensive-glycemic-control group. All patients were then transferred to a standard glycemia-control regimen |  Patients
		
			| Patients | high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes |  
			| Inclusion criteria | type 2 diabetes; glycated hemoglobin level of 7.5% or more; LDL cholesterol level of 60 to 180 mg per deciliter; HDL cholesterol level below 55 mg per deciliter for women and blacks or below 50 mg per deciliter for all other groups, and a triglyceride level below 750 mg per deciliter if they were not receiving lipid therapy or below 400 mg per deciliter (4.5 mmol per liter) if they were receiving lipid therapy;  
age between 40 to 79 y in case of evidence of clinical cardiovascular disease; |  Method and design
	
		| Randomized effectives | 2765 / 2753 (studied vs. control) |  
			| Design | Factorial plan |  
			| Blinding | double-blind |  
			| Follow-up duration | 4.7y |  
			| Number of centre | 77 |  
			| Geographic area | United States and Canada |  
			| Hypothesis | Superiority |  
			| Primary endpoint | fatal cardiovascular events, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke |  Results
	
		
	
	
		
			Endpoint
		
	
	
		
		Studied treat.n/N
			
	
	
		
		Control treat.
 n/N
		
	
	
		
			Graph
		
	
	
		
			RR [95% CI]
 
				Cardiovascular death
				99 / 2765 114 / 2753
 0,86 [0,66;1,13]
 
				stroke (fatal and non fatal) 
				51 / 2765 48 / 2753
 1,06 [0,72;1,56]
 
				All cause death
				203 / 2765 221 / 2753
 0,91 [0,76;1,10]
 
				cardiovascular events
				291 / 2765 310 / 2753
 0,93 [0,80;1,09]
 
				Coronary event
				332 / 2765 353 / 2753
 0,94 [0,81;1,08]
				
			
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
				0
			
		
		
		
		
		
				2
		
		
		
		
		
			1.0
 
		
		
				
					| Relative risks |  
			| Endpoint | Events (%) | Relative Risk | 95% CI | Endpoint definition in the trial
 | Ref |  
			| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
						| stroke (fatal and non fatal) | 51 / 2765 (1,8%) | 48 / 2753 (1,7%) | 1,06 | [0,72;1,56] |  |  |  
						| cardiovascular events | 291 / 2765 (10,5%) | 310 / 2753 (11,3%) | 0,93 | [0,80;1,09] | fatal and non ftala cardiovascular event |  |  
						| All cause death | 203 / 2765 (7,3%) | 221 / 2753 (8,0%) | 0,91 | [0,76;1,10] |  |  |  
						| Coronary event | 332 / 2765 (12,0%) | 353 / 2753 (12,8%) | 0,94 | [0,81;1,08] | fatal coronary events, non fatla MI, unstable angina |  |  
						| Cardiovascular death | 99 / 2765 (3,6%) | 114 / 2753 (4,1%) | 0,86 | [0,66;1,13] |  |  |  
			| The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters |  
			| Reference(s) used for data extraction: |  
			
			| Endpoint | studied treat. | control treat. | mean diff |  
	
	
				
					| Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4.7y) |  
		| Endpoint | Events rate | Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
 |  
		| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
				| stroke (fatal and non fatal) | 1,84% | 1,74% | 0,10% |  
				| cardiovascular events | 10,52% | 11,26% | -0,74% |  
				| All cause death | 7,34% | 8,03% | -0,69% |  
				| Coronary event | 12,01% | 12,82% | -0,82% |  
				| Cardiovascular death | 3,58% | 4,14% | -0,56% |  Meta-analysis of all similar trials: 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
				
			 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for diabetic patients 
				
			 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in diabetes type 2 for diabetic patients with or withour hypercholesterolemia
				
			 
				
					HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients
				
			 
		 Reference(s) 
			
				
			    . 
			    Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus..
			    N Engl J Med 2010 Mar 14;:
					- 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext
				
			    . 
			    Effects of Medical Therapies on Retinopathy Progression in Type 2 Diabetes..
			    N Engl J Med 2010 Jun 29;:
					- 10.1056/NEJMoa1001288
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext
				
			    Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, Basile J, Calles J, Cohen RM, Cuddihy R, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Grimm RH Jr, Hamilton BP, Hoogwerf B, Karl D, Katz L, Krikorian A, O'Connor P, Pop-Busui R, Schubart U, Simmons D, Taylor H, Thomas A, Weiss D, Hramiak I. 
			    Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial..
			    Lancet 2010 Jun 29;:
					- 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60576-4
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext 
 |