| 
 
		
		Related trials
		 
				 IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe  vs control 
				 AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose  vs simvastatin 
				 ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate  vs placebo (on top simvastatine) 
				 SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe  vs niacin 
				 ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin  vs placebo (on top statin) 
				 Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate  vs placebo 
				 ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin  vs ezetimibe 
				 AURORA, 2009 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment  vs standard teatment 
				 Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet  vs mediterranean-style diet 
				 GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose  vs pravastatin 
				 Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin  vs placebo 
				 MEGA, 2006 - pravastatin  vs control 
				 SPARCL, 2006 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 ASPEN, 2006 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
				 Hong, 2005 - simvastatin  vs control 
				 WHI low fat, 2005 - diet  vs usual diet 
				 Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D), 2005 - atorvastatin  vs placebo 
 
 
		See also:
		All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
				
			
		
			
			All clinical trials of cholesterol lowering intervention 
			
		
		
			
			All clinical trials of ezetimibe+simvastatin |  | 
	Treatments
	
		| Studied treatment | Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10mg 
 |  
		| Control treatment | placebo 
 |  
			| Remarks | 3 arms: Simvastatin 20 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10mg and placebo |  Patients
		
			| Patients | patients with established chronic kidney disease (dialysis or pre-dialysis) |  
			| Inclusion criteria | history of chronic kidney disease (CKD): either patients who are pre-dialysis (with a plasma or serum creatinine greater than or equal to 150 micromol/l [greater than or equal to 1.7 mg/dl] in men, or greater than or equal to 130 micromol/l [greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl] in women) or patients on dialysis (haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis); men or women aged greater than or equal to 40 years |  
			| Exclusion criteria | definite history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation procedure; functioning renal transplant, or living donor-related transplant planned; less than 2 months since presentation as an acute uraemic emergency; definite history of chronic liver disease, or abnormal liver function (i.e. alanine aminotransferase [ALT] > 1.5 x upper limit of normal [ULN] or, if ALT not available, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 1.5 x ULN); evidence of active inflammatory muscle disease (e.g. dermatomyositis, polymyositis), or creatinine kinase (CK) >3 x ULN; definite previous adverse reaction to a statin or to ezetimibe; concurrent treatment with a contraindicated drug (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor ("statin"); fibric acid derivative ("fibrate"); nicotinic acid; macrolide antibiotic (erythromycin, clarithromycin); systemic use of imidazole or triazole antifungals (e.g. itraconazole, ketoconazole); protease-inhibitors (e.g. antiretroviral drugs for HIV infection); nefazodone; ciclosporin); child-bearing potential; known to be poorly compliant with clinic visits or prescribed medication; medical history that might limit the individual's ability to take trial treatments for the duration of the study (e.g. severe respiratory disease, history of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer, or recent history of alcohol or substance misuse) |  Method and design
	
		| Randomized effectives | 4193 / 4191 (studied vs. control) |  
			| Design | Parallel groups |  
			| Blinding | double-blind |  
			| Follow-up duration | 4.9 years |  
			| Number of centre | 300 |  
			| Geographic area | 20 countries |  
			| Hypothesis | Superiority |  
			| Primary endpoint | vascular events: cardiac death, MI, any stroke, or any revascularization |  
			| Remarks | There is a certain incertitude concerning the primary endpoint (apparently changed by the Steering committe before the trial ended but this change was not endorsed by the sponsor)
Statistical analysis plan is not clear too, with or without the inclusion of patients  initially allocated to simvastatin alone and re-randomized to either combination or placebo for the remainder of the study period |  Results
	
		
	
	
		
			Endpoint
		
	
	
		
		Studied treat.n/N
			
	
	
		
		Control treat.
 n/N
		
	
	
		
			Graph
		
	
	
		
			RR [95% CI]
 
				Coronary event
				213 / 4650 230 / 4620
 0,92 [0,77;1,10]
 
				End stage renal disease
				1057 / 4650 1084 / 4620
 0,97 [0,90;1,04]
 
				Fatal stroke
				68 / 4650 78 / 4620
 0,87 [0,63;1,20]
 
				All cause death
				1142 / 4650 1115 / 4620
 1,02 [0,95;1,09]
 
				Cancer
				438 / 4650 439 / 4620
 0,99 [0,87;1,12]
 
				cardiovascular events
				710 / 4650 814 / 4620
 0,87 [0,79;0,95]
				
			
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
				0
			
		
		
		
		
		
				2
		
		
		
		
		
			1.0
 
		
		
				
					| Relative risks |  
			| Endpoint | Events (%) | Relative Risk | 95% CI | Endpoint definition in the trial
 | Ref |  
			| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
						| Coronary event | 213 / 4650 (4,6%) | 230 / 4620 (5,0%) | 0,92 | [0,77;1,10] |  |  |  
						| End stage renal disease | 1057 / 4650 (22,7%) | 1084 / 4620 (23,5%) | 0,97 | [0,90;1,04] |  |  |  
						| Fatal stroke | 68 / 4650 (1,5%) | 78 / 4620 (1,7%) | 0,87 | [0,63;1,20] |  |  |  
						| All cause death | 1142 / 4650 (24,6%) | 1115 / 4620 (24,1%) | 1,02 | [0,95;1,09] |  |  |  
						| Cancer | 438 / 4650 (9,4%) | 439 / 4620 (9,5%) | 0,99 | [0,87;1,12] | Any incident cancer |  |  
						| cardiovascular events | 710 / 4650 (15,3%) | 814 / 4620 (17,6%) | 0,87 | [0,79;0,95] | cardiac death, MI, any stroke, or any revascularization |  |  
			| The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters |  
			| Reference(s) used for data extraction: |  
			
			| Endpoint | studied treat. | control treat. | mean diff |  
	
	
				
					| Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 4.9 years) |  
		| Endpoint | Events rate | Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
 |  
		| Studied treat. | Control treat. |  
				| Coronary event | 4,58% | 4,98% | -0,40% |  
				| End stage renal disease | 22,73% | 23,46% | -0,73% |  
				| Fatal stroke | 1,46% | 1,69% | -0,23% |  
				| All cause death | 24,56% | 24,13% | 0,42% |  
				| Cancer | 9,42% | 9,50% | -0,08% |  
				| cardiovascular events | 15,27% | 17,62% | -2,35% |  Meta-analysis of all similar trials: 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations
				
			 
				
					cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for patients with renal insufficiency (on hemodialysis or transplant)
				
			 
		 Reference(s) 
			
				
			    Sharp Collaborative Group. 
			    Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP): Randomized trial to assess the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among 9,438 patients with chronic kidney disease..
			    Am Heart J 2010 Nov;160:785-794.e10
					- 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.08.012
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext
				
			    Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, Emberson J, Wheeler DC, Tomson C, Wanner C, Krane V, Cass A, Craig J, Neal B, Jiang L, Hooi LS, Levin A, Agodoa L, Gaziano M, Kasiske B, Walker R, Massy ZA, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Krairittichai U, Ophascharoensuk V, Fellström B. 
			    The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial..
			    Lancet 2011 Jun 25;377:2181-2192
					- 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60739-3
			    
  Pubmed
				 
				|
				
					Hubmed
				
				| Fulltext 
 |