Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home


Related trials

ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo

IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control

dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin

ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)

DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo

SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo

ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin

ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo

ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe

SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment

Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet

Guyton, 2008 - niacin+ezetimibe vs simvastatin+ezetimibe

GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin

RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo



See also:

  • All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of niacin
  • All clinical trials of niacin
  •  
     AIM-HIGH study, 2011 TRC9754 
    [NCT00120289] download pdf: niacin | cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention

    Treatments

    Studied treatment high-dose, extended-release niacin in gradually increasing doses up to 2000 mg daily (+ simvastatin)
    high-dose extended-release niacin (Niaspan) given in addition to statin therapy
    Control treatment placebo
    Concomittant treatment simvastatin (and ezetimibe, in order to maintain LDL-cholesterol levels at the target range between 40 and 80 mg/dL)

    Patients

    Patients patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, high triglycerides, and low levels of HDL cholesterol
    Inclusion criteria men and women; >=45 years old; with established vascular disease and atherogenic dyslipidemia; established vascular disease defined as one or more of the following: (1) documented coronary artery disease (CAD); (2) documented cerebrovascular or carotid disease; (3) documented symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) Atherogenic dyslipidemia defined as: (1) LDL-C of less than or equal to 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L); (2) HDL-C of less than or equal to 40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) for men or less than or equal to 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) for women; (3) TG greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and less than or equal to 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) For patients entering the trial on a statin: (1) the upper limit for LDL-C is adjusted according to the specific statin and statin dose; (2) HDL-C of less than or equal to 42 mg/dL (1.1 mmol/L) for men or less than or equal to 53 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) for women; (3) TG greater than or equal to 125 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) and less than or equal to 400 mg/DL (4.5 mmol/L)

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 1718 / 1691 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding double blind
    Follow-up duration 32 months
    Premature discontinuation Premature discontinuation for futility
    Geographic area US, Canada
    Hypothesis Superiority
    Primary endpoint CHD death, MI, ischaemic stroke, NSTEMI


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    Coronary event

    112 / 1718
    106 / 1691
    1,04 [0,80;1,34]

    cardiovascular events

    282 / 1718
    274 / 1696
    1,02 [0,87;1,18]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    27 / 1718
    15 / 1696
    classic 1,78 [0,95;3,33]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    cardiovascular events 282 / 1718 (16,4%) 274 / 1696 (16,2%) 1,02 [0,87;1,18]   16313
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 27 / 1718 (1,6%) 15 / 1696 (0,9%) 1,78 [0,95;3,33]   16313
    Coronary event 112 / 1718 (6,5%) 106 / 1691 (6,3%) 1,04 [0,80;1,34]   16313
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 16313: Lavigne PM, Karas RHThe current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-regression.J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 Jan 29;61:440-6

  • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 32 months)
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    cardiovascular events 16,41% 16,16% 0,26%
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 1,57% 8,84‰ 0,69%
    Coronary event 6,52% 6,27% 0,25%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations

    HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients

    niacin in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC9754
    Trials register # NCT00120289
    • Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, Koprowicz K, McBride R, Teo K, Weintraub W. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy.. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2255-67 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1107579
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2016 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels