Related trials
Lopaciuk, 3000 - subcutaneous heparin vs intravenous heparin
Romera, 2009 - Tinzaparin vs acenocoumarol
RE-COVER, 2009 - dabigatran vs vitamin K antagonists
Botticelli DVT, 2008 - apixaban vs heparin/VKA
HORIZONS-AMI (Stone), 2008 - bivalirudin vs Heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
ISAR-REACT 3, 2008 - bivalirudin vs UFH
Einstein-DVT Dose-Ranging Study, 2008 - rivaroxaban vs heparin/VKA
González-Fajardo, 2008 - Enoxaparin vs coumarin
VanGogh DVT, 2007 - idraparinux vs heparin/VKA
VanGogh PE, 2007 - idraparinux vs heparin/VKA
STEEPLE, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH
Hull, 2006 - extended tinzaparin vs vitamin K antagonist
INTERACT, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
Deitcher, 2006 - extended enoxaparin vs warfarin
ACUITY (Stone) (bivalirudin alone), 2006 - bivalirudin vs heparin + anti Gp2b3a
EVET, 2005 - enoxaparin vs tinzaparin
Wells (subgroup), 2005 - tinzaparin+warfarin vs dalteparin+warfarin
Daskalopoulos, 2005 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
Chong, 2005 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
Fiessinger , 2005 - ximelagatran vs vitamin K antagonists
MATISSE, 2004 - fondaparinux vs enoxaparin
Kearon, 2004 - 4 months vs 3 months
REPLACE-1, 2004 - bivalirudin vs UFH
Ramacciotti, 2004 - LMWH at home vs UFH in hospital
Deitcher, 2003 - Enoxaparin vs warfarin
See also:
All venous thrombosis clinical trials
|
|
Treatments
Studied treatment |
home treatment by once daily Subcutaneous injection of enoxaparin at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg for 5-10 days
|
Control treatment |
in hospital intravenous bolus injection of 5000 IU of UFH followed by intravenous 500 IU/kg/day adjusted to maintain an aPTT of 1.5-2.5 times the normal value for 5-10 days.
|
Remarks |
warfarin (with a targeted INR 2-3) for at least 3 months, starting at day 1 or 2 of treatment. |
Patients
Patients |
patienst with DVT symptoms for greater than or equal to 10 days and proximal lower limb DVT confirmed by duplex ultrasound or venography |
Inclusion criteria |
Age greater than or equal to 18 years, weight greater than or equal to 50 and
|
Exclusion criteria |
History of HIT or allergy to heparin, haemorrhagic diathesis, surgery within 7 days, symptoms of PE, bilateral DVT, survival prognaosis 3days, initial platelet count 1.3 time the normal value, INR> 1.5 at enrollment, indication for thrombolysis or venous thrombectomy |
Method and design
Randomized effectives |
104 / 97 (studied vs. control) |
Design |
Parallel groups |
Blinding |
open |
Number of centre |
multicenter |
Geographic area |
Brazil |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Recurrent thromboembolic event
2 / 104
7 / 97
0,27 [0,06;1,25]
Minor bleeding
12 / 104
9 / 97
classic
1,24 [0,55;2,82]
Major bleeding
2 / 104
2 / 97
classic
0,93 [0,13;6,49]
All cause death
0 / 104
0 / 97
classic
0,93 [0,00;236,78]
0
2
1.0
Relative risks
|
Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Recurrent thromboembolic event
|
2 / 104 (1,9%) |
7 / 97 (7,2%) |
0,27 |
[0,06;1,25] |
|
Minor bleeding
|
12 / 104 (11,5%) |
9 / 97 (9,3%) |
1,24 |
[0,55;2,82] |
|
Major bleeding
|
2 / 104 (1,9%) |
2 / 97 (2,1%) |
0,93 |
[0,13;6,49] |
|
All cause death
|
0 / 104 (0,5%) |
0 / 97 (0,5%) |
0,93 |
[0,02;46,55] |
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
Absolute risk reduction
|
Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
Recurrent thromboembolic event |
1,92% |
7,22% |
-52,9‰
|
Minor bleeding |
11,54% |
9,28% |
2,3%
|
Major bleeding |
1,92% |
2,06% |
-1,4‰
|
Reference(s)
-
Ramacciotti E, Araújo GR, Lastoria S, Maffei FH, Karaoglan de Moura L, Michaelis W, Sandri JL, Dietrich-Neto F.
An open-label, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dose of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal lower limb deep-vein thrombosis..
Thromb Res 2004;114:149-53
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|