List Of Non Gamstop Casinos UKCasinos Not On GamstopNon Gamstop CasinosCasino Non Aams ItaliaNon Gamstop Casinos
Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database Feedback    Home


Related trials

Lyon-II, 3000 - Ticlopidine vs placebo

Gardecki, 3000 - Ticlopidine vs placebo

ADVANCE 2, 2010 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)

ADVANCE 3, 2010 - apixaban vs enoxaparin

RECORD 4, 2009 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

WATCH (warfarin vs aspirin), 2009 - warfarin vs aspirin

RECORD 2, 2008 - rivaroxaban (long duration) vs enoxaparin (short duration)

RE-MOBILIZE (220mg), 2008 - dabigatran 220mg vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

ADVANCE-1, 2008 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

RECORD 1, 2008 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin

DRIVE, 2008 - SR123781A vs enoxaparin

RECORD 3, 2008 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)

RE-MOBILIZE (150mg), 2008 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

RE-MODEL (220mg), 2007 - dabigatran 220mg vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)

RE-NOVATE (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin

APROPOS 2.5mg, 2007 - apixaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

RE-MODEL (150mg), 2007 - dabigatran 150mg vs enoxaparin (europe regimen)

RE-NOVATE (220mg), 2007 - dabigatran 220mg vs enoxaparin

Cohen (L8405), 2007 - compression stocking group vs control (on top fondaparinux)

HELAS (warfarin vs aspirin), 2006 - warfarin vs aspirin

ODIXa-HIP 10mg, 2006 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (short duration)

ODIXa-KNEE, 2005 - rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin (US regimen)

WASH (warfarin), 2004 - warfarin vs no treatment

NASPEAF (triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs triflusal

NASPEAF (triflusal + coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose), 2004 - triflusal+coumadin medium dose vs coumadin standard dose



See also:

  • All DVT prophylaxis clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of new anticoagulants
  • All clinical trials of dabigatran 150mg
    		•  

    RE-NOVATE (150mg) study, 2007

    [NCT00168818] Facebook    pdf : dabigatran 150mg - antithrombotics for DVT prophylaxis

    Treatments

    Studied treatment dabigatran etexilate 150 mg q.d. 28-35 days
    Control treatment Enoxaparin 40 mg q.d. for 28-25 days
    starting the evening before surgery
    Concomittant treatment
    Remarks 3 arms dabigatran 220mg, 150mg and placebo
    Treatments description
    enoxaprin regimen started before surgery 
    treatment duration 28-35 days 

    Patients

    Patients Total hip replacement
    Inclusion criteria aged 18 years or older; weight at least 40 kg; scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip replacement
    Exclusion criteria any bleeding diathesis; history of acute intracranial disease or haemorrhagic stroke; major surgery, trauma, uncontrolled hypertension, or myocardial infarction in the past 3 months; gastrointestinal or urogenital bleeding, or ulcer disease in the past 6 months; severe liver disease; alanine or aspartate aminotransferase concentrations greater than two times the upper limit of the normal range in the past month; severe renal insuffi ciency (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min); use of long-acting non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs
    Remarks
    Baseline characteristics
    Age (mean), years 64y 
    Total hip replacement 100% 
    Total knee replacement 0% 
    Weight, kg, 79 kg 
    Female 56% 
    general anesthesia 25% 
    BMI (kg/m²) NA 
    History of venous thromboembolism (%) 2.5% 
    Use of cement NA 
    Estimated creatinine clearance >60 ml/min NA (mean 89 ml/min) 
    Previous orthopedic surgery (%) NA 
    Duration of surgery (min) 86 min 

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 1174 / 1162 (studied vs. control)
    Blinding double blind
    Follow-up duration 28-35 days, median 33d
    Number of centre 115
    Geographic area Europe, Australia, South Africa
    Hypothesis Non inferiority
    Primary endpoint total VTE and all-cause mortality
    Remarks

    Remarks / Comments



    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N     Control treat.
    n/N     Graph RR [95% CI]

    All cause death

    0 / 1167
         0 / 1142
         classic 0,98 [0,00;250,00]

    asymptomatic DVT

    63 / 871
         56 / 894
         1,15 [0,82;1,63]

    non-fatal pulmonary embolism

    1 / 1156
         3 / 1142
         classic 0,33 [0,03;3,16]

    proximal DVT

    28 / 885
         32 / 914
         0,90 [0,55;1,49]

    Major bleeding

    15 / 1163
         18 / 1154
         0,83 [0,42;1,63]

    total VTE and all-cause mortality

    75 / 874
         60 / 897
         1,28 [0,93;1,78]

    Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis

    9 / 1156
         1 / 1142
         classic 8,89 [1,13;70,07]

    distal DVT

    35 / 871
         24 / 894
         classic 1,50 [0,90;2,50]

    major VTE (fatal and non fatal DVT,PE)

    38 / 888
         36 / 917
         1,09 [0,70;1,70]     0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial    		 Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 0 / 1167 (0,0%) 0 / 1142 (0,0%) 0,98 [0,02;49,28]   7600 
    asymptomatic DVT 63 / 871 (7,2%) 56 / 894 (6,3%) 1,15 [0,82;1,63]    
    non-fatal pulmonary embolism 1 / 1156 (0,1%) 3 / 1142 (0,3%) 0,33 [0,03;3,16]    
    proximal DVT 28 / 885 (3,2%) 32 / 914 (3,5%) 0,90 [0,55;1,49] asymptomatic   
    Major bleeding 15 / 1163 (1,3%) 18 / 1154 (1,6%) 0,83 [0,42;1,63]   7600 
    total VTE and all-cause mortality 75 / 874 (8,6%) 60 / 897 (6,7%) 1,28 [0,93;1,78]    
    Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis 9 / 1156 (0,8%) 1 / 1142 (0,1%) 8,89 [1,13;70,07]    
    distal DVT 35 / 871 (4,0%) 24 / 894 (2,7%) 1,50 [0,90;2,50] asymptomatic   
    major VTE (fatal and non fatal DVT,PE) 38 / 888 (4,3%) 36 / 917 (3,9%) 1,09 [0,70;1,70]    
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 7600: Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N, Kurth AA, van Dijk CN, Frostick SP, Prins MH, Hettiarachchi R, Hantel S, Schnee J, Büller HRDabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.Lancet 2007;370:949-56

    • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    asymptomatic DVT 7,23% 6,26% 9,7‰
    non-fatal pulmonary embolism 0,87‰ 2,63‰ -1,8‰
    proximal DVT 3,16% 3,50% -3,4‰
    Major bleeding 1,29% 1,56% -2,7‰
    total VTE and all-cause mortality 8,58% 6,69% 1,9%
    Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis 7,79‰ 0,88‰ 6,9‰
    distal DVT 4,02% 2,68% 1,3%
    major VTE (fatal and non fatal DVT,PE) 4,28% 3,93% 3,5‰

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    anticoagulant in DVT prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery

    antithrombotics in DVT prophylaxis for elective hip replacement

    antithrombotics in DVT prophylaxis for orthopedic surgery

    direct antithrombins in DVT prophylaxis for all type of patients

    new anticoagulants in DVT prophylaxis for elective hip replacement

    new anticoagulants in DVT prophylaxis for orthopaedic surgery

    new anticoagulants in DVT prophylaxis for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NCT00168818
    • Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N, Kurth AA, van Dijk CN, Frostick SP, Prins MH, Hettiarachchi R, Hantel S, Schnee J, Büller HR. Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.. Lancet 2007;370:949-56
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2011 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend

    Digital discoveries