PDF factsheet
      Z

antithrombotics in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients, clinical trials results

any anticoagulant versus aspirin
EPSIM, 1982
anticoagulant
versus
aspirin 500mg three times daily
patients surviving myocardial infarctionopen
Follow-up duration: 29 months (range 6-59)
any anticoagulant versus placebo
Sixty Plus reinfarction Study, 1980
anticoagulant
versus
placebo
over 60 years of agedouble blind
Follow-up duration: 2 years
Argatroban versus heparin
ARGAMI-2, 1998
Argatroban 60–20 mg/kg bolus; 2–4 µg /kg/min infusion for 72h
versus
UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion
AMI
Follow-up duration: 30 days
bivalirudin versus heparin
HERO, 1997
Bivalirudin 0.125–0.250 mg/kg bolus; 0.125–0.500 mg /kg/min infusion for 72h
versus
UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000–1200 IU/h infusion
AMI (patients presenting within 12 hours with ST-segment elevation)double blind
Follow-up duration: 35 days
coumadin versus aspirin
ASPECT-2 (coumadin alone), 2002
coumadin (phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol) target INR 3-4
versus
aspirin 80mg daily
Acute MI, unstable anginaopen
Follow-up duration: 1 year (range 0-26 months)
the Netherlands
coumadin versus control (on top of aspirin)
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+ASA vs ASA), 2002
coumadin(INR mean 2.4) +aspirin
versus
aspirin
Acute MI, unstable angina open
Follow-up duration: 1 year
the Netherlands
coumadin versus placebo
ASPECT, 1994
nicoumalone or phenprocoumon, target INR 2.8–4.8
versus
placebo
hospital survivors of myocardial infarctiondouble blind
Follow-up duration: 37 months (range 6-76)
Dalteparin versus placebo
BIOMACS II, 1999
Dalteparin 100 mg/kg, 2 doses
versus
placebo
patients with acute myocardial infarction, Age <=80 y, STEMI or new LBBBDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: 14–21 d
FRAMI, 1997
Dalteparin 150 mg/kg BID for 7–11 d
versus
placebo
patients with an acute MI, Q wave or STEMIDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: in hospital
Dalteparin versus UFH
ASSENT Plus, 2003
Dalteparin first dose 90 IU/kg, then 120 IU/kg BID, 4–7 d
versus
UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 800–1000 IU/h for 48 h
Patients with AMI treated with alteplase open
Follow-up duration: 30 d
Enoxaparin versus placebo
AMI-SK, 2002
Enoxaparin 30 mg IV bolus, 1 mg/kg for 3–8 d
versus
placebo
patients with evolving myocardial infarction, Age >=18 y, STEMIDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: 30 d
Enoxaparin versus UFH
ASSENT 3 Plus, 2003
Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d
versus
UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d
patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctionopen
Follow-up duration: 30 d
ASSENT 3, 2001
Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=7d
versus
UFH 60 U/kg bolus, then 12 IU/kg per h for 48 h
patients with acute myocardial infarctionopen
Follow-up duration: 30 d
Baird, 2002
Enoxaparin 40 mg TID, 4 d
versus
UFH 5000 IU bolus, then 30 000 IU over 24 h for 4d
patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction 90-min TIMI flow
Follow-up duration: 90 d
ENTIRE-TIMI 2, 2002
Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=8d
versus
UFH 60 IU/kg, then 12 IU/kg per h for >=3d
Patients with ST-elevation MI presenting <6 hours from symptom onset were open
Follow-up duration: 30 d
HART II, 2001
Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID, <=3d
versus
UFH 4000–5000 IU bolus, then 15 IU/kg per hour for >=3d
patients undergoing reperfusion therapy with an accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator regimen and aspirin for AMIopen
Follow-up duration: 5–7 d
fondaparinux versus placebo
MICHELANGELO OASIS-6, 2006
NCT00064428
fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days
versus
control (UFH or placebo)
patients with STEMI double-blind
Follow-up duration: 30 days
41 countries
Hirudin versus heparin
HIT-4, 1999
Hirudin 0.2 mg/kg bolus; 0.5 mg/kg twice daily 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 5-7 days
versus
Placebo bolus, UFH 12 500 IU twice daily
patients with AMI <=6 h were treated with aspirin and streptokinase double blind
Follow-up duration: 30 days
TIMI 9B, 1996
Hirudin 0.1 mg/kg bolus; 0.1 mg /kg/h infusion for 96h
versus
UFH 5000 IU bolus; 1000 IU/h infusion
Unstable angina or AMIopen
Follow-up duration: 30 days
phenprocoumon versus aspirin
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs asp), 1980
phenprocoumon
versus
aspirin 1.5 g daily
patients who had survived a myocardial infarction for 30-42 daysdouble blind
Follow-up duration: 2 years
phenprocoumon versus placebo
German-Austrian Study Group (oac vs pbo), 1980
phenprocoumon
versus
placebo
patients who had survived a myocardial infarction for 30-42 daysdouble blind
Follow-up duration: 2 years
Reviparin versus placebo
CREATE, 2005
Reviparin 3436–6871 IU BID for 7 d (weight adjusted)
versus
placebo
patients with acute myocardial infarction, STEMI or new LBBB, <=12 hDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: 30 d
UFH versus no heparin
ISIS-2 Pilot, 1987
UFH nNo bolus, 1000 IU/h for 48 h
versus
No heparin
patients with suspected MI <=24 hopen
Follow-up duration: In-hospital, 1 y (deat
DUCCS, 1994
UFH no bolus, 15 IU/kg per h for 4 d; target aPTT 50–90 s
versus
No heparin
patients with acute myocardial infarction four hours after APSAC administration, age <=85 y STEMI <=12 hopen
Follow-up duration: 14 d
UFH versus placebo
ECSG, 1992
UFH 5000 IU bolus, UFH 1000 IU/h for 48–120 h
versus
Placebo
patients treated with alteplase thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction, Age 21–70 y STEMI <=6hDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: In-hospital
OSIRIS, 1992
UFH 10 000 IU bolus, 1000 IU/h for 24 h
versus
Placebo
STEMI w=6 hDouble-blind
Follow-up duration: In-hospital
warfarin versus aspirin
WARIS II (warfarin alone), 2002
warfarin target INR 2.8-4.2
versus
ASA 160mg/d
patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction NA
Follow-up duration: 48 months
Norway
warfarin versus control (on top of aspirin)
WARIS, 1999
warfarin 2.8–4.8
versus
placebo
survivors of acute myocardial infarction double blind
Follow-up duration: 37 months
APRICOT-2, 2002
moderate-intensity coumarin target INR 2-3 (+aspirin)
versus
aspirin
Acute MI after thrombolytics open
Follow-up duration: 3 months
the Netherlands
CARS (warafrin 3mg), 1997
warfarin fixed dose 3mg/d + 80 mg ASA
versus
aspirin 160 mg/d
AMI double blind
Follow-up duration: 14 months
North America
CARS (warfarin 1mg), 1997
warfarin 1mg/d + aspirin 80mg/d
versus
aspirin 160 mg/d
patients who had had myocardial infarctiondouble blind
Follow-up duration: 14 months
North America
CHAMP, 2002
warfarin target INR 1.5-2.5 + aspirin 81 mg daily
versus
aspirin 162 mg/d
AMI (patients enrolled within 14 days of infarction)open
Follow-up duration: 2.7 years
US
LoWASA, 2004
warfarin fixed dose 1.25mg/d + ASA 75mg/d
versus
aspirin alone
AMIopen
Follow-up duration: 5 years
Sweden
WARIS II (warfarin+ASA), 2002
warfarin target INR 2-2.5 +ASA 75mg/d
versus
ASA 160mg/d
patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarctionopen
Follow-up duration: 4 years
Norway
Zibaeenezhad, 2004
Warfarin target INR 2–3 +aspirin
versus
aspirin 100 mg/day
Acute MIopen
Follow-up duration: 1 year
warfarin versus placebo (on top of aspirin)
Williams, 1997
warfarin target INR 2–2.5 +aspirin
versus
placebo +aspirin
Acute MI, unstable angina double blind
Follow-up duration: 2.5 months

  Options


in first

in second

  Filter