Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home

Systematic review and meta-analysis

This trial is included in the following systematic reviews and meta-analyses:

cardiovascular prevention - CEPT inhibition - all type of patients

cardiovascular prevention - HDL increasing drugs - all type of patients


Related trials

ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo

dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)

DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo

Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo

ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe

ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

RADIANCE 1, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

ILLUSTRATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

FIELD, 2005 - fenofibrate vs placebo

LEADER, 2002 - bezafibrate vs placebo

DAIS, 2001 - fenofibrate vs placebo

HATS, 2001 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

BIP, 2000 - bezafibrate vs placebo

VA-HIT, 1999 - gemfibrozil vs placebo

SENDCAP, 1998 - bezafibrate vs placebo

LOCAT, 1997 - gemfibrozil vs placebo

BECAIT, 1996 - bezafibrate vs placebo

HHS (Frick)(secondary prev subgroup), 1993 - gemfibrozil vs placebo

Hanefeld, 1991 - clofibrate vs placebo



See also:

  • All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of HDL increasing drugs
  • All clinical trials of dalcetrapib
  •  
     dal-OUTCOMES study, 2012 TRC12830 
    [NCT00658515] download pdf: dalcetrapib | CEPT inhibition for cardiovascular prevention

    Treatments

    Studied treatment dalcetrapib 600 mg daily beginning 4 to 12 weeks after an index ACS event
    Control treatment placebo
    Concomittant treatment individualized, evidence-based programs for lowering their LDL cholesterol levels by means of statin therapy (if they did not have unacceptable side effects) and diet, with a target LDL cholesterol level of 2.6 mmol per liter or lower and preferably 1.8 mmol per liter or lower.

    Patients

    Patients patients with recent acute coronary syndrome

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 7938 / 7933 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding double-blind
    Follow-up duration 31 montsh (median)
    Premature discontinuation Premature discontinuation for futility
    Number of centre 935
    Geographic area 27 countries
    Primary endpoint CV events


    Results



    Endpoints and data reported in the trial's publication(s)

    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    CV events 656 / 7938 (8,3%) 633 / 7933 (8,0%) 1,04 [0,93;1,15]
    Death from coronary heart disease 118 / 7938 (1,5%) 125 / 7933 (1,6%) 0,94 [0,73;1,21]
    Nonfatal acute myocardial infarction 414 / 7938 (5,2%) 407 / 7933 (5,1%) 1,02 [0,89;1,16]
    Hospitalization for unstable angina 84 / 7938 (1,1%) 92 / 7933 (1,2%) 0,91 [0,68;1,22]
    Cardiac arrest with resuscitation 14 / 7938 (0,2%) 10 / 7933 (0,1%) 1,40 [0,62;3,15]
    Stroke of presumed atherothrombotic cause 91 / 7938 (1,1%) 73 / 7933 (0,9%) 1,25 [0,92;1,69]
    Death from any cause 226 / 7938 (2,8%) 229 / 7933 (2,9%) 0,99 [0,82;1,18]
    Unanticipated coronary revascularization 674 / 7938 (8,5%) 672 / 7933 (8,5%) 1,00 [0,90;1,11]

    Endpoints used by the meta-analysis and data retained for this trial

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    All cause death

    226 / 7938
    229 / 7933
    0,99 [0,82;1,18]

    cardiovascular events

    656 / 7938
    633 / 7933
    1,04 [0,93;1,15]

    Coronary death

    118 / 7938
    125 / 7933
    0,94 [0,73;1,21]

    Coronary revascularization

    674 / 7938
    672 / 7933
    1,00 [0,90;1,11]

    stroke (fatal and non fatal)

    91 / 7938
    73 / 7933
    1,25 [0,92;1,69]

    Coronary event

    656 / 7938
    633 / 7933
    1,04 [0,93;1,15]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 226 / 7938 (2,8%) 229 / 7933 (2,9%) 0,99 [0,82;1,18] Death from any cause 
    cardiovascular events 656 / 7938 (8,3%) 633 / 7933 (8,0%) 1,04 [0,93;1,15] CV events 
    Coronary death 118 / 7938 (1,5%) 125 / 7933 (1,6%) 0,94 [0,73;1,21] Death from coronary heart disease 
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 91 / 7938 (1,1%) 73 / 7933 (0,9%) 1,25 [0,92;1,69] Stroke of presumed atherothrombotic cause 
    Coronary revascularization 674 / 7938 (8,5%) 672 / 7933 (8,5%) 1,00 [0,90;1,11] Unanticipated coronary revascularization 
    Coronary event 656 / 7938 (8,3%) 633 / 7933 (8,0%) 1,04 [0,93;1,15] CV events 
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:

    Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 31 montsh (median))
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    All cause death 2,85% 2,89% -0,04%
    cardiovascular events 8,26% 7,98% 0,28%
    Coronary death 1,49% 1,58% -0,09%
    stroke (fatal and non fatal) 1,15% 9,20‰ 0,23%
    Coronary revascularization 8,49% 8,47% 0,02%
    Coronary event 8,26% 7,98% 0,28%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    CEPT inhibition in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients

    HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC12830
    Trials register # NCT00658515
    • Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJ, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Chaitman BR, Duttlinger-Maddux R, Mathieson J. Rationale and design of the dal-OUTCOMES trial: efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome.. Am Heart J 2009 Dec;158:896-901.e3
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext
    • Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Brumm J, Chaitman BR, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJ, Mundl H, Nicholls SJ, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Wright RS. Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome.. N Engl J Med 2012 Nov 5;: - 10.1056/NEJMoa1206797
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2016 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels