Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database in Heart and vessels Feedback    Home


Related trials

ACCELERATE, 2015 - evacetrapib vs placebo

IMPROVE-IT, 2014 - ezetimibe vs control

dal-OUTCOMES, 2012 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

dal-VESSEL, 2011 - dalcetrapib vs placebo

AIM-HIGH, 2011 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

SEARCH, 2010 - simvastatin high dose vs simvastatin

ACCORD lipid, 2010 - fenofibrate vs placebo (on top simvastatine)

DEFINE, 2010 - anacetrapib vs placebo

SHARP, 2010 - ezetimibe+simvastatin vs placebo

ARBITER-HALTS 6, 2010 - ezetimibe vs niacin

ARBITER 2, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Oxford Niaspan Study, 2009 - niacin vs placebo (on top statin)

Emmerich, 2009 - etofibrate vs placebo

ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe), 2009 - niacin vs ezetimibe

SANDS, 2008 - aggressive treatment vs standard teatment

Tuttle, 2008 - low fat diet vs mediterranean-style diet

Guyton, 2008 - niacin+ezetimibe vs simvastatin+ezetimibe

GISSI-HF rosuvastatine, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

JUPITER, 2008 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

SAGE, 2007 - atorvastatin high dose vs pravastatin

RADIANCE 2, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

Krum, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

ILLUMINATE, 2007 - torcetrapib vs placebo (on top of atorvastatin)

CORONA, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo

METEOR, 2007 - rosuvastatin vs placebo



See also:

  • All cardiovascular prevention clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of niacin
  • All clinical trials of niacin
  •  
     ARBITER 6-HALTS (niacin vs ezetimibe) study, 2009 TRC10059 
    [NCT00397657] download pdf: niacin | cholesterol lowering intervention for cardiovascular prevention

    Treatments

    Studied treatment extended-release niacin 1 g/d, titrated to max tolerable dose up to 2 g/d (HDL-focused strategy)
    Control treatment ezetimibe 10 mg/d (LDL-focused strategy)

    Patients

    Patients patients with known coronary or vascular disease or coronary risk equivalents

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 97 / 111 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding open
    Follow-up duration 14 months
    Premature discontinuation Premature discontinuation for futility
    Number of centre 2
    Geographic area US
    Primary endpoint carotid intima-media thickness


    Results

    Endpoint Studied treat.
    n/N
    Control treat.
    n/N
    Graph RR [95% CI]

    Coronary event

    2 / 187
    9 / 176
    0,21 [0,05;0,95]

    cardiovascular events

    282 / 187
    9 / 176
    classic 29,49 [15,69;55,42]
    0 2 1.0

    Relative risks
    Endpoint Events (%) Relative Risk 95% CI Endpoint definition
    in the trial
    Ref
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    cardiovascular events 282 / 187 (150,8%) 9 / 176 (5,1%) 29,49 [15,69;55,42]   16313
    Coronary event 2 / 187 (1,1%) 9 / 176 (5,1%) 0,21 [0,05;0,95]   16313
    The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
    Reference(s) used for data extraction:
  • 16313: Lavigne PM, Karas RHThe current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-regression.J Am Coll Cardiol 2013 Jan 29;61:440-6

  • Endpoint studied treat. control treat. mean diff

    Absolute risk reduction (for a follow-up of 14 months)
    Endpoint Events rate Absolute risk
    reduction (ARR)
    Studied treat. Control treat.
    cardiovascular events 150,80% 5,11% 145,7%
    Coronary event 1,07% 5,11% -4,04%

    Meta-analysis of all similar trials:

    cholesterol lowering intervention in cardiovascular prevention for all chronical situations

    HDL increasing drugs in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients

    niacin in cardiovascular prevention for all type of patients



    Reference(s)

    TrialResults-center ID TRC10059
    Trials register # NCT00397657
    • Taylor AJ, Villines TC, Stanek EJ, Devine PJ, Griffen L, Miller M, Weissman NJ, Turco M. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness.. N Engl J Med 2009 Nov 26;361:2113-22
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext
    • Villines TC, Stanek EJ, Devine PJ, Turco M, Miller M, Weissman NJ, Griffen L, Taylor AJ. The ARBITER 6-HALTS Trial (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6-HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis) Final Results and the Impact of Medication Adherence, Dose, and Treatment Duration.. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 Apr 8;: - 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.017
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2016 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  Facebook  |  notify a friend

    100Heart and vessels