| Trial-Results center | |||
| Clinical trial results database 100 |
 Feedback
 Home
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis
This trial is included in the following systematic reviews and meta-analyses:
acute myocardial infarction
-
myocardial revascularization
-
all type of patients
Related trials
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
PASEO, 2009 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus eluting stent vs sirolimus eluting stent
CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
DEDICATION, 2008 - drug-eluting stents vs bare-metal stent
D�az de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus eluting stent vs bare-metal stent
ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs balloon angioplasty
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs Thrombolysis
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus eluting stent vs paclitaxel eluting stent
GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 - immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty
See also:
MERLIN (Sutton) study, 2004 |
|
Tweet
Facebook
 pdf :
immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte
-
myocardial revascularization for acute myocardial infarction
|
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
emergency coronary angiography with rescue PCI
|
| Control treatment |
conservative treatment
|
Patients
| Patients | patients with STEMI and failed fibrinolysis |
Method and design
| Randomized effectives | NA / NA (studied vs. control) |
| Design | Parallel groups |
| Follow-up duration | 30 days |
Results
No results available for this trial - no clinical endpoint reported
Meta-analysis of all similar trials:
myocardial revascularization in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
PCI in acute myocardial infarction for all type of patients
Reference(s)
| Trials register # | NA |
-
Sutton AG, Campbell PG, Graham R, Price DJ, Gray JC, Grech ED, Hall JA, Harcombe AA, Wright RA, Smith RH, Murphy JJ, Shyam-Sundar A, Stewart MJ, Davies A, Linker NJ, de Belder MA.
A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial..
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:287-96
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
(c) 2004-2011 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved
Tweet this
notify a friend