Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database Feedback    Home


Related trials

ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES

TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase

DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis

Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

PASEO, 2009 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent

CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis

HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent

MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

DEDICATION, 2008 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent

Díaz de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent

PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent

WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI

CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis

Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs ballon angioplasty

CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI

senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs thrombolytic therapy

STOPAMI 3, 2004 - primary stenting vs ballon angioplasty

GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI



See also:

  • All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of PCI
  • All clinical trials of systematic ballon angioplasty
    		•  

    Vermeer study, 1999

    Treatments

    Studied treatment alteplase followed by transfer to the PTCA centre and (if indicated) rescue PTCA
    Control treatment thrombolytic treatment with alteplase
    Remarks 3rd arms: transfer for primary PTCA

    Patients

    Patients patients with acute myocardial infarction initially admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives NA / NA (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Follow-up duration 42 days


    Results

    No results available for this trial - no clinical endpoint reported



    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NA
    • Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG, Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, Lousberg AH, Dassen WR, Bär FW. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study.. Heart 1999;82:426-31
      Pubmed | Hubmed | Fulltext

    (c) 2004-2010 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend