Related trials
APPRAISE-1 (10mg od), 2009 - apixaban vs placebo
SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42, 2009 - otamixaban vs unfractioned heparin
PLATO, 2009 - ticagrelor + aspirin vs clopidogrel + aspirin
ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46, 2009 - rivaroxaban vs placebo
APPRAISE-1 (2.5 mg bid), 2009 - apixaban vs placebo
DISPERSE-2 (90mg), 2007 - ticagrelor + aspirin vs clopidogrel + aspirin
INTERACT, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
OASIS 5, 2006 - fondaparinux vs enoxaparin
PROTECT-TIMI 30, 2006 - Bivalirudin vs eptifibatide + heparin
SYNERGY, 2005 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
EVET, 2005 - enoxaparin vs tinzaparin
LoWASA, 2004 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
PENTUA, 2004 - fondaparinux vs enoxaparin
Zibaeenezhad, 2004 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
APRICOT-2, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+asp vs asp), 2002 - coumadin vs control (on top of aspirin)
WARIS, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
ASPECT-2 (coumadin vs aspirin), 2002 - coumadin vs aspirin
CHAMP, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
OASIS-2 Warfarin Substudy, 2001 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
CURE, 2001 - clopidogrel + aspirin vs aspirin
Huyhn, 2001 - warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin)
TIM, 2000 - triflusal vs aspirine
HIT-4, 1999 - Hirudin vs heparin
Klootwijk, 1999 - Efegatran vs heparin
See also:
All acute coronary syndrome clinical trials
All clinical trials of antithrombotics
All clinical trials of warfarin
|
|
ATACS (pilot study) (warfarin vs control) study, 1990
|
|
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
heparin/warfarin target INR 3-4.5 + aspirin
|
| Control treatment |
aspirin alone
|
| Concomittant treatment |
aspirin 325 mg daily |
Patients
Method and design
| Randomized effectives |
37 / 32 (studied vs. control) |
| Blinding |
open |
| Follow-up duration |
3 months |
| Lost to follow-up |
2.9% |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke
0 / 37
1 / 32
classic
0,17 [0,00;12,35]
Extracranial hemorrhage
3 / 37
3 / 32
classic
0,86 [0,19;3,99]
Major bleeding
3 / 37
3 / 32
classic
0,86 [0,19;3,99]
intracranial hemorrhage
0 / 37
0 / 32
classic
0,86 [0,00;216,66]
0
2
1.0
|
Relative risks
|
| Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
|
all cause death, non-fatal MI, thrombo-embolic stroke
|
0 / 37 (1,4%) |
1 / 32 (3,1%) |
0,43 |
[0,01;12,47] |
|
8504 |
|
Extracranial hemorrhage
|
3 / 37 (8,1%) |
3 / 32 (9,4%) |
0,86 |
[0,19;3,99] |
|
8504 |
|
Major bleeding
|
3 / 37 (8,1%) |
3 / 32 (9,4%) |
0,86 |
[0,19;3,99] |
|
8504 |
|
intracranial hemorrhage
|
0 / 37 (1,4%) |
0 / 32 (1,6%) |
0,86 |
[0,02;42,36] |
|
8504 |
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
8504: Andreotti F, Testa L, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Crea FAspirin plus warfarin compared to aspirin alone after acute coronary syndromes: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 25,307 patients.Eur Heart J 2006;27:519-26
0:
|
| Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
|
Absolute risk reduction
|
| Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
| Extracranial hemorrhage |
8,11% |
9,38% |
-12,7‰
|
| Major bleeding |
8,11% |
9,38% |
-12,7‰
|
Reference(s)
-
Cohen M, Adams PC, Hawkins L, Bach M, Fuster V.
Usefulness of antithrombotic therapy in resting angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in preventing death and myocardial infarction (a pilot study from the Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes Study Group)..
Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1287-92
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|