Related trials
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
PASEO, 2009 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent
CARESS, 2008 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
HORIZONS-AMI Stent, 2008 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent
MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
DEDICATION, 2008 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent
Díaz de la Llera, 2007 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
SESAMI, 2007 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
TYPHOON, 2006 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
PROSIT, 2006 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
HAAMU-STENT, 2006 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent
PASSION, 2006 - paclitaxel ES vs bare-metal stent
WEST, 2006 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
Di Lorenzo et al., 2005 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ZWOLLE 6, 2005 - primary stenting vs ballon angioplasty
CAPITAL AMI, 2005 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
senior PAMI, 2005 - primary PCI vs thrombolytic therapy
STOPAMI 3, 2004 - primary stenting vs ballon angioplasty
GRACIA-1, 2004 - systematic PCI (+stent) vs no systematic PCI
MERLIN (Sutton), 2004 - immediate systematic ballon angioplastyte vs no immediate angioplasty
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All clinical trials of myocardial revascularization
All clinical trials of Prehospital thrombolysis
|
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
anistreplase by mobile intensive care unit
|
| Control treatment |
|
| Treatments description |
| Thrombolytic agent |
Anistreplase |
| Time from sympton onset to thrombolysis |
median 130/190 min |
| Provider |
MICU |
|
Patients
| Inclusion criteria |
Chest pain duration from 30 min to <6 h from symptom onset or chest pain <30 min and not responding to nitrates Patients stratified by ECG changes into ST-segment elevation group (at least 2.0 mm in at least 2 precordial leads, at least 1 mm in 2 limb leads, or both) or no ST-segment elevation group (QRS >0.12 s or isolated ST-segment level depression or tall T-waves with coronary artery disease) |
| Exclusion criteria |
Use of oral anticoagulants (antiplatelet allowed), hemorrhagic diasthesis, pyloric ulcer disease, stroke, surgery or major trauma <6 mo previously, external cardiac massage, SBP >200 mm Hg and/or DBP >120 mm Hg, pregnancy, coronary angioplasty less than 2 wk prior, no consent, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator |
Method and design
| Randomized effectives |
2750 / 2719 (studied vs. control) |
| Blinding |
ND |
| Follow-up duration |
ND |
| Lost to follow-up |
ND |
| Withdrawals (T1/T0) |
ND / |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
251 / 2750
284 / 2719
0,87 [0,74;1,03]
0
2
1.0
|
Relative risks
|
| Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
|
All cause death
|
251 / 2750 (9,1%) |
284 / 2719 (10,4%) |
0,87 |
[0,74;1,03] |
|
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
|
| Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
|
Absolute risk reduction
|
| Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
| All cause death |
9,13% |
10,45% |
-13,2‰
|
Reference(s)
-
,.
Prehospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The European Myocardial Infarction Project Group..
N Engl J Med 1993; 329:383-9
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|