Trial-Results center  
Clinical trial results database Feedback    Home


Related trials

SPIRIT IV, 2010 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

SORT-OUT-3, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES

ISAR-DESIRE-2, 2010 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

RESOLUTE, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs everolimus ES

ZEST (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

PASEO, 2009 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent

Thiele, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs MIDCAB

ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs zotarolimus ES

ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009 - polymer free sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES

ENDEAVOR IV, 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

GENIUS-STEMI, 2009 - Genous stent vs bare-metal stent

ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009 - CABG+surgical ventricular reconstruction vs CABG

ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs sirolimus ES

COMPARE, 2009 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009 - biodegradable-polymer sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES

ZEST (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES

ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES

BARI 2D, 2009 - CABG or PCI vs medical treatment

DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent

ISAR-TEST-4, 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer vs sirolimus ES

SYNTAX, 2009 - paclitaxel ES vs CABG

ISAR-LEFT-MAIN, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

Kim, 2008 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES

MISSION, 2008 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent



See also:

  • All coronary artery disease clinical trials
  • All stable angina clinical trials
  • All clinical trials of revascularization with drug eluting stent
  • All clinical trials of sirolimus ES
  •  

    RES-I study, 2010

    [NCT00606333]

    Treatments

    Studied treatment Nevo Cobalt Chromium Sirolimus-reservoir eluting Coronary Stent System
    Nevo cobalt-chromium stent dotted with reservoirs
    Control treatment TAXUS Liberte Paclitaxel-eluting Coronary Stent System

    Patients

    Patients De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions with length of 28 mm or less and range in diameter from 2.5 to 3.5 mm

    Method and design

    Randomized effectives 202 / 192 (studied vs. control)
    Design Parallel groups
    Blinding open
    Follow-up duration 1 y
    Number of centre 40
    Geographic area Europe, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand
    Primary endpoint late loss


    Results

    No results available for this trial - no clinical endpoint reported



    Reference(s)

    Trials register # NCT00606333
    Study web site link ,

    External links about this trial

    (c) 2004-2010 TrialResults-center - All Rights Reserved

    Tweet this  |  notify a friend