Related trials
SPIRIT IV, 2010 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ISAR-DESIRE-2, 2010 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
SORT-OUT-3, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
RESOLUTE, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs everolimus ES
ZEST (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
Thiele, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs MIDCAB
ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs zotarolimus ES
PASEO, 2009 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009 - polymer free sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009 - CABG+surgical ventricular reconstruction vs CABG
ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs sirolimus ES
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
GENIUS-STEMI, 2009 - Genous stent vs bare-metal stent
COMPARE, 2009 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009 - biodegradable-polymer sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES
ZEST (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
BARI 2D, 2009 - CABG or PCI vs medical treatment
ISAR-TEST-4, 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer vs sirolimus ES
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
SYNTAX, 2009 - paclitaxel ES vs CABG
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All coronary artery disease clinical trials
All stable angina clinical trials
All clinical trials of revascularization with drug eluting stent
All clinical trials of sirolimus ES
|
|
Di Lorenzo et al. study, 2005
|
|
unpublished (or not yet fully published) trial
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
sirolimus
|
| Control treatment |
paclitaxel
|
Patients
| Patients |
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction |
Method and design
| Randomized effectives |
90 / 90 (studied vs. control) |
| Design |
Parallel groups |
| Blinding |
open |
| Number of centre |
NA |
| Geographic area |
NA |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
3 / 90
4 / 90
classic
0,75 [0,17;3,26]
MI (fatal and non fatal)
4 / 90
3 / 90
classic
1,33 [0,31;5,79]
target lesion revascularisation
3 / 90
4 / 90
classic
0,75 [0,17;3,26]
Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)
0 / 90
1 / 90
classic
0,20 [0,00;14,51]
angiographic restenosis
NA / 90
NA / 90
4y stent thrombosis (ARC)
0 / 90
1 / 90
classic
0,20 [0,00;14,51]
0
2
1.0
|
Relative risks
|
| Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
|
All cause death
|
3 / 90 (3,3%) |
4 / 90 (4,4%) |
0,75 |
[0,17;3,26] |
|
|
|
MI (fatal and non fatal)
|
4 / 90 (4,4%) |
3 / 90 (3,3%) |
1,33 |
[0,31;5,79] |
|
|
|
Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)
|
0 / 90 (0,6%) |
1 / 90 (1,1%) |
0,50 |
[0,02;14,72] |
|
|
|
4y stent thrombosis (ARC)
|
0 / 90 (0,6%) |
1 / 90 (1,1%) |
0,50 |
[0,02;14,72] |
|
|
|
target lesion revascularisation
|
3 / 90 (3,3%) |
4 / 90 (4,4%) |
0,75 |
[0,17;3,26] |
|
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
| Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
|
Absolute risk reduction
|
| Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
| All cause death |
3,33% |
4,44% |
-11,1‰
|
| MI (fatal and non fatal) |
4,44% |
3,33% |
1,1%
|
| target lesion revascularisation |
3,33% |
4,44% |
-11,1‰
|
Reference(s)
unpublished (or not yet fully published) trial
-
Di Lorenzo E, Varricchio A, Lanzillo T, et al..
Paclitaxel and sirolimusstent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (abstr).
Circulation 2005;112:U538
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|