Related trials
SPIRIT IV, 2010 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ISAR-DESIRE-2, 2010 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
SORT-OUT-3, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
RESOLUTE, 2010 - zotarolimus ES vs everolimus ES
Thiele, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs MIDCAB
TRIANA, 2009 - primary ballon angioplasty vs tenecteplase
ZEST AMI (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
ISAR TEST 3 (BP), 2009 - biodegradable-polymer sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES
DEBATER (SES vs BMS), 2009 - sirolimus ES vs bare-metal stent
STICH (ventricular reconstruction), 2009 - CABG+surgical ventricular reconstruction vs CABG
NORDISTEMI, 2009 - thrombolysis + angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis
ENDEAVOR IV, 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ZEST AMI (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
Juwana, 2009 - sirolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
COMPARE, 2009 - everolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
ISAR TEST 2 (vs ZES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs zotarolimus ES
ZEST (vs PES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs paclitaxel ES
BARI 2D, 2009 - CABG or PCI vs medical treatment
ZEST (vs SES), 2009 - zotarolimus ES vs sirolimus ES
ISAR-TEST-4, 2009 - sirolimus biodegradable polymer vs sirolimus ES
PASEO, 2009 - drug ES vs bare-metal stent
GENIUS-STEMI, 2009 - Genous stent vs bare-metal stent
ISAR TEST 2 (vs SES), 2009 - dual sirolimus, probucol ES vs sirolimus ES
ISAR TEST 3 (PF), 2009 - polymer free sirolimus stent vs sirolimus ES
SYNTAX, 2009 - paclitaxel ES vs CABG
See also:
All acute myocardial infarction clinical trials
All coronary artery disease clinical trials
All clinical trials of revascularization with drug eluting stent
All clinical trials of paclitaxel ES
|
|
HAAMU-STENT study, 2006
|
|
unpublished (or not yet fully published) trial
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
Taxus Express
|
| Control treatment |
Bare-metal-stent
|
| Concomittant treatment |
After PCI, patients were treated with a 300- to 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, followed by clopidogrel 75 mg daily for one year |
Patients
| Patients |
AMI - STEMI patients undergoing PCI |
| Baseline characteristics |
| age |
63 |
| diabetes (%) |
15% |
| Lesion diameter inclusion criteria |
NA |
| Female (%) |
28% |
|
Method and design
| Randomized effectives |
70 / 75 (studied vs. control) |
| Design |
Parallel groups |
| Blinding |
open |
| Follow-up duration |
12 months |
| Number of centre |
1 |
| Geographic area |
Finland |
| Primary endpoint |
none |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
All cause death
8 / 70
4 / 75
classic
2,14 [0,67;6,80]
Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)
1 / 70
3 / 75
classic
0,36 [0,04;3,35]
angiographic restenosis
NA / 70
NA / 75
0
2
1.0
|
Relative risks
|
| Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
|
All cause death
|
8 / 70 (11,4%) |
4 / 75 (5,3%) |
2,14 |
[0,67;6,80] |
|
|
|
Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up)
|
1 / 70 (1,4%) |
3 / 75 (4,0%) |
0,36 |
[0,04;3,35] |
|
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
| Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
|
Absolute risk reduction
|
| Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
| All cause death |
11,43% |
5,33% |
6,1%
|
| Stent thrombosis (any, end of follow up) |
1,43% |
4,00% |
-25,7‰
|
Reference(s)
unpublished (or not yet fully published) trial
-
Tierala I, Syvaenne M, Kupari M.
Randomised comparison of apaclitaxel-eluting and a bare metal stent in STEMI-PCI. TheHAAMU-STENT-study.
Annual Scientifi c Meeting of theTranscatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics; Washington, DC;Oct 2227, 2006. Abstract 178.
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
External links about this trial
|