Related trials
APPRAISE-1 (10mg od), 2009 - apixaban vs placebo
SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42, 2009 - otamixaban vs unfractioned heparin
PLATO, 2009 - ticagrelor + aspirin vs clopidogrel + aspirin
ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46, 2009 - rivaroxaban vs placebo
APPRAISE-1 (2.5 mg bid), 2009 - apixaban vs placebo
DISPERSE-2 (90mg), 2007 - ticagrelor + aspirin vs clopidogrel + aspirin
INTERACT, 2006 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
OASIS 5, 2006 - fondaparinux vs enoxaparin
PROTECT-TIMI 30, 2006 - Bivalirudin vs eptifibatide + heparin
SYNERGY, 2005 - enoxaparin vs UFH (on top of aspirin)
EVET, 2005 - enoxaparin vs tinzaparin
LoWASA, 2004 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
PENTUA, 2004 - fondaparinux vs enoxaparin
Zibaeenezhad, 2004 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
APRICOT-2, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
ASPECT-2 (coumadin+asp vs asp), 2002 - coumadin vs control (on top of aspirin)
WARIS, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
ASPECT-2 (coumadin vs aspirin), 2002 - coumadin vs aspirin
CHAMP, 2002 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
OASIS-2 Warfarin Substudy, 2001 - warfarin vs control (on top of aspirin)
CURE, 2001 - clopidogrel + aspirin vs aspirin
Huyhn, 2001 - warfarin vs placebo (on top of aspirin)
TIM, 2000 - triflusal vs aspirine
HIT-4, 1999 - Hirudin vs heparin
Klootwijk, 1999 - Efegatran vs heparin
See also:
All acute coronary syndrome clinical trials
All clinical trials of antithrombotics
All clinical trials of triflusal
|
|
Treatments
| Studied treatment |
triflusal 300 mg three times daily
|
| Control treatment |
placebo
|
Patients
| Patients |
patients with unstable angina |
Method and design
| Randomized effectives |
143 / 138 (studied vs. control) |
| Design |
Parallel groups |
| Blinding |
double blind |
| Follow-up duration |
6m |
| Number of centre |
10 |
| Geographic area |
Spain |
| Hypothesis |
vascular death, MI |
Results
Endpoint
Studied treat. n/N
Control treat. n/N
Graph
RR [95% CI]
Non fatal MI
6 / 143
17 / 138
0,34 [0,14;0,84]
Vascular events
8 / 143
17 / 138
0,45 [0,20;1,02]
Major bleeding
0 / 143
0 / 138
classic
0,97 [0,00;245,47]
Vascular death
2 / 143
0 / 138
classic
8,69 [0,14;537,57]
Non vascular death
0 / 143
0 / 138
classic
0,97 [0,00;245,47]
Revascularization
24 / 143
28 / 138
0,83 [0,51;1,35]
0
2
1.0
|
Relative risks
|
| Endpoint |
Events (%) |
Relative Risk |
95% CI |
Endpoint definition in the trial |
Ref |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
|
Non fatal MI
|
6 / 143 (4,2%) |
17 / 138 (12,3%) |
0,34 |
[0,14;0,84] |
|
|
|
Vascular death
|
2 / 143 (1,4%) |
0 / 138 (0,4%) |
3,86 |
[0,18;84,85] |
|
|
|
Non vascular death
|
0 / 143 (0,3%) |
0 / 138 (0,4%) |
0,97 |
[0,02;48,30] |
|
|
|
Revascularization
|
24 / 143 (16,8%) |
28 / 138 (20,3%) |
0,83 |
[0,51;1,35] |
|
|
|
Vascular events
|
8 / 143 (5,6%) |
17 / 138 (12,3%) |
0,45 |
[0,20;1,02] |
|
|
|
Major bleeding
|
0 / 143 (0,3%) |
0 / 138 (0,4%) |
0,97 |
[0,02;48,30] |
|
|
|
The primary endpoint (if exists) appears in blod characters
|
|
Reference(s) used for data extraction:
0:
|
| Endpoint |
studied treat. |
control treat. |
mean diff |
|
Absolute risk reduction
|
| Endpoint |
Events rate |
Absolute risk reduction (ARR) |
| Studied treat. |
Control treat. |
| Non fatal MI |
4,20% |
12,32% |
-81,2‰
|
| Revascularization |
16,78% |
20,29% |
-35,1‰
|
| Vascular events |
5,59% |
12,32% |
-67,2‰
|
Reference(s)
-
Plaza L, Lopez-Bescos L, Martin-Jadraque L, Alegria E, Cruz-Fernandez JM, Velasco J, Ruiperez JA, Malpartida F, Artal A, Cabades A.
Protective effect of triflusal against acute myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina: results of a Spanish multicenter trial. Grupo de Estudio del Triflusal en la Angina Inestable..
Cardiology 1993;82:388-98
Pubmed
|
Hubmed
| Fulltext
|