A randomised clinical trial investigating the effect of ICD versus no ICD in patients with non ischemic cardiomyopathy with EF <0.36 and Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or frequent premature ventricular complexes
Studied treatment | ICD |
Control treatment | no ICD, standard medical therapy |
Age (mean), years | 58 y |
Men (%) | 71% |
cross over to ICD (%) | NA |
cross over to medical treatment (%) | NA |
Patients | patients with non ischemic cardiomyopathy with EF <0.36 and Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or frequent premature ventricular complexes |
Group sizes | 229 / 229 |
Ischaemic cause (%) | 0% |
beta-blocker use (%) | 85% |
ACE-I or ARB use (%) | 86% vs 11% |
Spironolactone use (%) | |
Blinding endpoint comittee | yes |
nonischemic cardiomyopathy '%) |
Blindness | open | Inclusion period | 1998-2000 |
Follow-up duration | 29 months | Centers | |
Lost to FU | geographical localisation | ||
Primary endpoint | Total mortality | Design | Parallel groups |
PeriodeInclusion | 1998-2000 | ||
duration of CHD | 2.8 y |
Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NA, Anderson KP, Calkins H, Hoch D, Goldberger J, Shalaby A, Sanders WE, Schaechter A, Levine JH Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2151-8 [PMID: 15152060] link to pdf add to Mendeley
Albert CM, Quigg R, Saba S, Estes NA 3rd, Shaechter A, Subacius H, Howard A, Levine J, Kadish A Sex differences in outcome after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 2008;156:367-72 [PMID: 18657670] link to pdf add to Mendeley
Appears in following systematic reviews: